“I Thought They Had It Easier”
Part 1 of 3

I used to believe that the people who didn’t go into an office every day—who stayed home, who “had more time,” who weren’t hustling to climb ladders—had it easier.
That belief didn’t come from a place of malice. It came from exhaustion. From grinding nonstop and wondering why I still felt behind. From sitting in meetings with people talking about being overwhelmed, and thinking: Yeah, but you get to nap.
Turns out, I was the judgmental jerk.
And like most judgmental jerks, I had to live it to get it.
When I became the one who stopped going in. Who stayed back. Who kept the house going while someone else chased the thing we both said mattered—only one of us was getting paid to pursue it.
That’s when I realized how loud a house can be in silence. How a sink full of dishes can whisper, you don’t matter. How “just handle it” becomes a full-time job with no benefits, no clock-out, no performance review. And how easy it is to feel invisible in your own life.
The work didn’t get easier. It just got harder to explain.
And that’s the thing about invisible responsibilities. They’re not assigned. They’re absorbed.
You look up one day and realize you’re managing everything that was never on a job description—emotional labor, coordination, second shifts, being the soft place to land and the one who makes it all work.
So this is the start of something I wish someone had handed me:
A way to talk about what this feels like. A way to own how I used to see it. A way to build better from both sides of the story.
Next up? How we carry this forward without shame—but with clarity.
“The Job Description Nobody Posted”
Position: Chief Operating Officer of Everything That Matters
Department: Invisible Infrastructure
Reporting Structure: Everyone reports to you; you report to no one
Salary: $0 + unlimited overtime
Benefits: The satisfaction of knowing everything would fall apart without you
Here’s what I thought “not working” looked like when I was the one grinding through 60-hour weeks:
- Leisurely mornings with coffee and news
- Flexible schedule with built-in downtime
- Freedom to tackle household tasks at your own pace
- Social lunches and afternoon errands
The Reality Check
Here’s the actual daily breakdown I discovered:
6:30 AM: Emergency triage (someone can’t find their presentation, dog needs out, coffee maker died overnight)
8:00 AM: Transition logistics (wave goodbye to the person who gets adult conversations, inherit seventeen urgent tasks)
10:00 AM: Operations management (scheduling, coordination, problem-solving for people who didn’t know there were problems)
12:00 PM: Lunch break (standing over the sink, eating leftovers while responding to texts about dinner plans)
3:00 PM: Crisis prevention (handling the issues that would derail everyone else’s day if left unmanaged)
6:00 PM: Emotional labor shift begins (managing everyone’s decompression while suppressing your own needs)
Strategic Insight: The most efficient operations are invisible. When everything runs smoothly, the person making it happen becomes functionally invisible too.
The Coordination Tax
Every family has a Chief Coordination Officer—the person who maintains the mental database of:
- Who needs what, when, and why
- Which deadlines are approaching across multiple people’s lives
- What’s been handled versus what’s still pending
- How everyone’s emotional and logistical needs intersect
This isn’t “helping out.” This is systems management for people who didn’t know they were part of a system.
Professional Translation
If this were a corporate role, the job description would read:
- Project Manager: Coordinating multiple stakeholders with competing priorities
- Executive Assistant: Anticipating needs and managing logistics
- HR Director: Handling interpersonal dynamics and emotional intelligence
- Operations Manager: Ensuring seamless daily function across all departments
But since it happens at home, it’s called “not working.”
The Performance Review That Never Comes
Success in this role is measured by the absence of problems. The better you perform, the more invisible your contribution becomes. Your effectiveness is demonstrated by other people’s ability to focus on their priorities without distraction.
Next week: Why emotional labor isn’t therapy—it’s infrastructure management.
“Emotional Labor: The Infrastructure Nobody Budgets For”
Let’s get clear on what emotional labor actually is:
It’s not being nice. It’s not being nurturing. It’s not having feelings.
Emotional labor is the cognitive and emotional work of:
- Monitoring and managing interpersonal dynamics
- Anticipating emotional needs before they become crises
- Maintaining relational equilibrium across multiple people
- Processing and responding to others’ emotional states while regulating your own
Think of it as Relationship Operations.
The Invisible Job Functions
1. Emotional Project Management
- Tracking everyone’s stress levels, triggers, and support needs
- Coordinating emotional logistics around major events, deadlines, or changes
- Managing the timeline of when people need space versus when they need connection
2. Interpersonal Quality Assurance
- Monitoring family/household dynamics for potential conflict
- Preventing emotional breakdowns through proactive intervention
- Maintaining communication standards across relationships
3. Emotional Customer Service
- Being the first point of contact for everyone’s frustrations, fears, and celebrations
- Providing unlimited emotional support with no reciprocal support structure
- Managing expectations while absorbing the impact of others’ stress
The Strategic Problem
When I was leading teams professionally, I got recognized for emotional intelligence. Creating psychological safety, managing difficult personalities, being the person others came to for guidance—those were leadership competencies that showed up on performance reviews.
The same skills applied at home? Invisible. Expected. Uncompensated.
The Mental Load Reality
Emotional labor comes with a cognitive load that never stops:
- Remembering that someone has a big presentation next week and will need extra support
- Noticing mood shifts and adjusting your approach accordingly
- Carrying the emotional history of everyone’s sensitivities and triggers
- Managing your own emotional needs while prioritizing everyone else’s
The Business Case for Recognition
If emotional labor were a consulting service:
- Conflict Prevention: $150/hour
- Team Dynamics Optimization: $200/hour
- Stakeholder Relationship Management: $175/hour
- Crisis Communication: $250/hour
- Change Management Support: $300/hour
Annual value: Approximately $78,000-$125,000 for a full-time family emotional operations role.
The Burnout Math
Input: Unlimited emotional availability
Output: Everyone else’s emotional stability
Recovery Time: Borrowed from sleep, personal time, or mental health
Sustainability Rating: Approximately six months before system failure
The Recognition Gap
Professional settings celebrate emotional intelligence as a leadership skill. Home settings assume it as a personality trait.
The difference? One comes with promotion potential. The other comes with the assumption that you’ll keep doing it forever because you’re “naturally good at it.”
Strategic Framework for Change
Level 1: Name it as work, not personality
Level 2: Track the time and cognitive load involved
Level 3: Create boundaries around emotional availability
Level 4: Redistribute emotional labor across household members
Next week: How to repair the damage from years of making wrong assumptions.
“The Repair Process (Or: How to Apologize for Being Wrong About Everything)”
The Problem with “I’m Sorry”
Generic apologies don’t address systemic dismissal. “I’m sorry if you felt unsupported” puts the focus on feelings rather than impact.
Strategic Repair Framework
Phase 1: Specific Acknowledgment
- “I dismissed your contributions as less valuable than mine”
- “I made assumptions about your workload without understanding what was actually required”
- “I treated invisible work as if it wasn’t real work”
Phase 2: Impact Assessment
- “This made you feel undervalued in your own life”
- “My judgment contributed to your sense of invisibility”
- “I benefited from your work while simultaneously devaluing it”
Phase 3: Behavioral Commitment
- “I will actively recognize work that doesn’t show up on traditional metrics”
- “I will ask questions instead of making assumptions about workload”
- “I will share responsibility for invisible work rather than delegating it by default”
Phase 4: Consistent Follow-Through Words without sustained behavioral change are performance, not repair.
The Leadership Lesson I Applied Too Late
Professional Context: I would never assume someone’s job was easy without understanding their responsibilities. I’d ask questions, observe their work, ensure they felt valued for their contributions.
Personal Context: I made assumptions based on surface-level visibility rather than functional understanding.
The disconnect revealed a blind spot in how I applied leadership principles across different environments.
Practical Repair Actions
Daily Recognition
- Acknowledge coordination work: “Thank you for managing all the details I would have missed”
- Recognize emotional labor: “I appreciate how you handled that situation so everyone felt heard”
- Validate invisible contributions: “The house runs smoothly because of everything you manage behind the scenes”
Weekly Check-ins
- “What can I take off your plate this week?”
- “What support do you need that you’re not getting?”
- “What work are you doing that I should be recognizing more?”
Monthly Systems Review
- Redistribute mental load responsibilities
- Create visibility for invisible work
- Adjust expectations and boundaries
The Hardest Part: Sitting with the Impact
The most difficult aspect wasn’t changing behavior—it was accepting how my “productivity-focused” mindset had systematically devalued someone whose work enabled everyone else’s success.
Pattern Recognition Beyond Personal
Once I identified this dynamic at home, I started seeing it everywhere:
- The executive assistant managing leadership team dynamics
- The operations manager preventing crises before they became visible
- The team member whose “people skills” actually prevented dozens of conflicts weekly
Cultural Integration Challenge
Individual behavior change addresses personal relationships. Cultural change requires systemic recognition that:
- Invisible work is infrastructure, not extra credit
- Coordination and emotional labor are professional competencies
- Support work enables other people’s productivity and success
Repair as Ongoing Process
Regret: Backward-looking emotional response
Repair: Forward-focused behavioral commitment
Repair isn’t a conversation. It’s a practice that requires:
- Consistent recognition of previously invisible work
- Ongoing redistribution of responsibility
- Sustained commitment to changed assumptions
Next week: How to move forward without repeating the same blind spots.
“The Framework for Not Screwing This Up Again”
The Awareness Trap
Recognizing you were wrong doesn’t automatically prevent future wrong assumptions. I could acknowledge my judgment, apologize sincerely, and still catch myself making similar mistakes about other people’s work.
The New Assessment Protocol
Before making any judgment about someone’s workload or contribution:
Question 1: What work am I not seeing?
Question 2: What’s the invisible infrastructure here?
Question 3: Who’s carrying the mental load that makes this look effortless?
Professional Application Framework
Old Leadership Approach:
- Judge productivity by visible outputs
- Assume workload transparency
- Equate presence with contribution
Updated Leadership Approach:
- Recognize infrastructure work as strategic function
- Ask questions about invisible requirements
- Value coordination and prevention equally with production
The Systematic Implementation
Daily Practice: Notice and acknowledge one piece of invisible work
Weekly Review: Identify assumptions I made about others’ responsibilities
Monthly Assessment: Evaluate how I’m supporting people doing unseen labor
Strategic Questions for Any Environment
Professional Settings:
- Who prevents the problems that would derail everyone else?
- What coordination work makes our team function smoothly?
- Which emotional labor keeps our culture intact?
Personal Relationships:
- What mental load am I not carrying?
- How is invisible work distributed in this relationship?
- What support structures exist that I take for granted?
The Ripple Effect Strategy
Individual Change: Modify personal assumptions and behaviors
Relationship Change: Create new recognition and support patterns
Cultural Change: Influence how others see and value invisible work
Conversation Starters That Change Perspective
- “I used to think staying home was easier. Now I understand how much work I wasn’t seeing. What invisible work are you managing?”
- “What keeps everything running smoothly that people don’t usually notice?”
- “How can I better support the coordination work you’re doing?”
The Business Case for Broader Change
Organizations that recognize invisible work:
- Higher employee retention (people feel valued for actual contributions)
- Better team dynamics (emotional labor is acknowledged as professional skill)
- More effective operations (infrastructure work gets proper resources)
Implementation at Scale
Recognition Systems: Acknowledge coordination and emotional labor as measurable contributions
Role Definitions: Include invisible work in job descriptions and performance reviews
Resource Allocation: Budget for support and infrastructure roles appropriately
The Long-Term Commitment
This isn’t a one-time correction. It’s an ongoing practice of:
- Questioning assumptions about whose work matters
- Recognizing value in work that doesn’t generate traditional metrics
- Supporting people whose contributions enable everyone else’s success
The Final Framework Shift
From: “What did you accomplish today?”
To: “What are you managing that I should know about?”
From: “They have it easier”
To: “What am I not seeing?”
From: “If it’s not visible, it’s not that important”
To: “The most important work often happens where nobody’s watching”
The Sustainable Practice
This requires ongoing vigilance against reverting to old assumptions. The default cultural programming is strong: we’re trained to value visible, measurable, revenue-generating work.
Maintaining the new framework means regularly asking:
- Who makes this look easy?
- What infrastructure am I taking for granted?
- How can I support the people doing essential invisible work?
The Invitation Forward
If you’ve been making the same assumptions I was, join me in questioning them.
If you’re doing invisible work that goes unrecognized, you deserve better than assumptions about your time and contribution.
If you’re in a position to change how work gets valued and recognized, use that influence.
The weight that matters most is often the weight that goes unseen. But invisible doesn’t have to mean unrecognized.